Globe Asiatique

Popular Searches: 3 Bedroom house at Bahayang Pag asa, 350 sqm Two Storey House near Fil Am Fri, Ac parts line assembler, 3bedroom Pines Model At 1.060m Through P, 3bdrs 3tb House An Lot At Mt. Carmel Sub

    • Price Call for pricing
    • Classification For sale
    • Classified ID 37377
    • Category Services
    •   Legal
    • Location Mandaluyong City

    • Date Posted Jul-15-2014
    • Page Views 10

  • Delfin Lee
    DelfinLee
    • Member Since
    • Jul-15-2014
    • Last Login
    • Jul-09-2016
    • Company
    • GLOBE ASIATIQUE REALTY HOLDINGS CORPORATION
    • Website
    • http://globeasiatique.ph/
    • Address
    • 2ND Floor, GA Tower 2 Condominium, EDSA, Boni Ave., Mandaluyong City
    • Contact
    • 576-6618



Liked it? Share it!



Description


Globe Asiatique wins against Pagibig : CA Decision Final and Executory

Written byDelfin Lee

CA-G.R.SP NO. 128262

DECISION

Page 20 of page 21

The propriety and correctness of the Summary Judgment is a proper subject of an appeal under Rule 41 as what was resorted to by Faria and Atty. Bernabe. We are also aware that public respondents denial of HDMFS Motion of Reconsideration of the Summary Judgment made the case final in view of its (HDMFS) failure to file the correct appeal under Rule 41 within the 15-day period and it cannot be corrected by Certiorari (under Rule 65) as a substitute appeal for a lost one (Under Rule 41). Be that as it may the instant case is far from being completely final and executor considering that Faria and Atty. Bernabe have seasonably appealed the same under Rule 41. To pass upon the above mentioned matter, re propriety and correctness of Summary Judgment now in the instant petition is not only improper but also hovers on procedural and jurisdictional matters not to mention that it would be premature as it preempts the proper and timely adjudication of the respective appeals (of Faria and Atty. Bernabe) on its merits by this Court at the proper opportune time.

WHEREOF, there being no grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack of excess of jurisdiction on the part of public rendering the assailed Resolution dated January 30, 2012 containing the Summary Judgment and the Resolution dated December 11, 2012 denying HDMF, Faria and Atty. Bernabes Motion for Reconsideration, the instant petition is herebyDISMISSED.

SO ORDERED.

STEPHEN C. CRUZ

Associate Justice

WE CONCUR:

MAGDANGAL M. DE LEON

Associate Justice

ELIHU A. YBANEZ

Associate Justice









Disclamer

HanapTayo.Com takes no responsibility for the content of the ads, promises made, or the quality/reliability of the product or services offered in all ads. You hereby acknowledge that any reliance upon any materials shall be at your sole risk.